52
special levy on shipping should be made to meet the whole or
part of that cost. They have given their decision in favour
of dredging to the greater depth on the assumption that the
dues of the port, which are already fairly high, will not be
increased, since, in their opinion, it is not desirable to
penalise the bulk of the shipping using the port for the sake
of a few large liners, however desirable it may be in the
interests of Hong Kong and the liner companies concerned, that
this work should be undertaken.
(7) The Committee notice that the quotations on which the
tentative estimates of cost have been based by the Hong Kong
Government came from a foreign firm. The Hong Kong Government
have no doubt already considered the desirability of utilizing
British enterprise for the execution of this work if this can
be done without excessive increase of cost. The Committee
would point out that in view of the probable co-operation of
the Admiralty additional emphasis should be attached to this
consideration, since part of the money will be coming from the
tax payer of the United Kingdom. Although this aspect of the
question has not been directly referred to them, the Committee,
in their capacity of an Imperial Committee representing all
the Governments of the Empire, would venture to suggest that
since a considerable part of the cost of such schemes is
involved in bringing plant to the spot, there is probably room
for co-operation between the Harbour Authorities of the
eastern ports of the Empire, such as Bombay, Colombo and
Singapore.
(8) I would add that the Committee have had the advantage
of consulting Mr. Adam Anderson, the Port Engineer of Hong Kong
and Mr. C.G.S. Mackie, a member of the Hong Kong Harbour
Advisory Committee, on the subject, and they wish to place on
record their appreciation of the assistance which, by reason of
their local knowledge and experience, these two gentlemen were
able to give to the Committee in this Inquiry.
I have, etc.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.